Brainstem stroke presenting as isolated bilateral ptosis
- Sunil James and
- Karunakaran Pradeep Thozhuthumparambil
- Department of Acute Internal Medicine, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Correspondence to Dr Sunil James; sunil.james1@nhs.net
Abstract
Pure midbrain infarctions not involving surrounding structures are an uncommon clinical phenomenon. A midbrain infarction that results in isolated bilateral ptosis as the only neurological deficit is much rarer and an easy diagnosis to miss; therefore, potentially leading to further downstream complications. We describe the case of an elderly patient who presented with isolated bilateral ptosis, initially thought to be consequent to myasthenia gravis but subsequently identified to have a perforator infarct in the midbrain, resulting in his symptoms.
Background
Among cerebral infarctions, pure midbrain infarctions are a rarity with prevalence rates ranging between 0.6% and 2.3%.1 The midbrain is primarily supplied by the posterior cerebral circulation, including the basilar, superior cerebellar and posterior cerebral arteries. The blood supply is complex, with variations in vascularity at the inferior colliculus, superior colliculus and pretectal levels. These three levels are further divided axially into medial and lateral zones. The medial zone at each level is supplied by the basilar artery and its paramedian branches.
At the level of the inferior colliculus, the lateral zone receives branches from the superior cerebellar artery. At the level of the superior colliculus and the pretectal level, the lateral zone is supplied by the posterior cerebral artery. However, the superior colliculus and adjacent tectum are supplied by the superior cerebellar artery. As such, posterior circulatory embolic strokes appear to be the most common aetiology for midbrain infarction, though often they do involve surrounding structures (pons, thalamus and cerebellum) with the resultant clinical manifestations.2 3
Pure midbrain lesions are infrequent and often are associated with oculomotor nerve palsy. Clinical manifestations are in keeping with the area and extent of the stroke; whereby, paramedian lesions result in ocular motor weakness and ataxia; anterolateral lesions result in hemiparesis and hemiataxia; lateral lesions cause sensory disturbances and combined anteromedial/anterolateral lesions result in hemiparesis and oculomotor disturbances.1 3–6 An isolated bilateral ptosis is a rare manifestation of a midbrain infarction.
We present the case of an elderly man who presented to the eye emergency with isolated bilateral ptosis and was subsequently diagnosed with a small acute perforator infarct in the midbrain.
Case presentation
Our patient, an 89-year-old man (background of diabetes and hypertension), presented to the Birmingham Midland Eye Centre emergency department with acute onset bilateral ptosis (right side worse than the left), which had suddenly occurred that morning, while he was watching television. He also reported feeling generally unwell and unsteady while walking. On examination, his ocular movements were normal and full range, with no nystagmus, no diplopia, no anisocoria and no relative afferent pupillary defect. He had normal colour vision and visual acuity. There was no obvious facial palsy. There was bilateral ptosis, more marked on the right side. He was transferred to the medical admissions unit for further investigation.
He also reported upper respiratory symptoms suggestive of a viral infection that self-resolved 3 weeks ago. There was no significant family history of neuromuscular disorders and no headache. His cranial nerve examination was normal except for bilateral ptosis, which was more marked on the right side. The rest of the cranial nerve examination was normal. He had no incoordination and had a normal gait. His limb tone and power were normal. There was no pronator drift. He had normal flexor plantar reflexes. A CT scan of his head reported changes in keeping with mild to moderate periventricular chronic ischaemic small vessel disease but no acute intracranial haemorrhage, extra-axial collection, space occupying lesion or acute major territorial infarction.
Neurology saw the patient and agreed with the majority of findings but noted a subtle element of fatigability. In keeping with an isolated bilateral ptosis without extraocular eye movement abnormality or pupil involvement, the differentials were ocular myasthenia, postviral sequelae or a stroke. Given his presentation, the patient was started on pyridostigmine 30 mg three times a day and also received 300 mg of aspirin while awaiting an MRI diffusion-weighted scan.
Investigations
The patient subsequently underwent a multiplanar MRI of the head, which reported a tiny focus of restricted diffusion seen in the right periaqueductal white matter of the midbrain with corresponding T2 high signal suggesting small acute perforator infarct (figure 1). At this point, the pyridostigmine was stopped and aspirin was continued. He had a carotid Doppler, which revealed diffuse atherosclerotic changes with no flow-limiting lesions in the internal carotid arteries and normal direction of flow in the vertebral arteries. A transthoracic echocardiogram revealed no obvious intracardiac source of emboli, good left ventricular function and no significant valve abnormalities.
Diffusion MRI scan of the patient. Tiny acute perforator infarct in the right periaqueductal white matter of the midbrain.
Differential diagnosis
Given that our patient did demonstrate some forms of mild fatigability, a differential to consider would include a much more common cause of bilateral ptosis—myasthenia gravis.7 However, the acute onset and lack of extraocular muscle involvement made this less likely.8 Another differential to consider would be structural lesions in the midbrain such as an inflammatory granuloma, tumour or demyelination. Infectious causes such as tuberculoma9 or neurocysticercosis10 have been previously shown to present with isolated bilateral ptosis. However, these would have been identified on the MRI.10
Treatment
Our patient was started on aspirin for 2 weeks, followed by clopidogrel and discharged with stroke team follow-up.
Outcome and follow-up
Unfortunately, the patient then developed right-sided weakness both in the upper and lower limbs, 5 months after his presentation to us with ptosis. A repeat MRI showed an acute lacunar infarct in the left corona radiata. On examination, he had mildly reduced power in his right lower limb hip flexion 4/5 and knee flexion 4+. He had no arm weakness, facial weakness or speech disturbance and had no sensory deficit. His gait was slow but had no spastic features. He was seen by the stroke specialist and initiated on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel for 1 month and thereafter to continue on clopidogrel alongside his usual statin, antihypertensive and antidiabetic medication.
Discussion
Ptosis is a common sign that has main aetiological roots ranging from neurogenic to traumatic causes.7 Bilateral ptosis, however, has a more limited aetiology and can be classified as neurogenic or congenital. Congenital causes include that poorly developed levator palpebrae superioris muscles and neurogenic causes including an oculomotor palsy or autoimmune disorders such as myasthenia gravis.11 Considering the acute presentation of the patient, a congenital cause was deemed unlikely, while neurogenic causes were considered.
Neurogenic causes present based on the location of the lesion. The oculomotor nerve innervates four out of six extraocular muscles and the levator palpebrae muscles that elevate the eyelids.12 The oculomotor nucleus lies ventral of the periaqueductal grey matter within the medial tegmentum. Afferent projections to the oculomotor nucleus originate from the cerebral cortex, cerebellum, mesencephalon, pons and medulla. The oculomotor nucleus is comprised of a lateral somatic motor column and a medial visceral cell column. The lateral somatic motor column contains three subnuclei: the lateral, medial and central subnuclei. The lateral subnucleus provides innervation to the ipsilateral inferior rectus, inferior oblique and medial rectus muscles. The medial subnucleus supplies the contralateral superior rectus muscle. Innervation of the bilateral levator palpebrae superioris is provided by the central subnucleus.
Despite the complex anatomy of the brainstem, while performing a neurological examination in the clinical setting, only a few of the main structures of the brainstem are often tested.13 An easy method to remember the structures of the brainstem and thus, their associated pathology, would be the rule of four, described by Gates.13 In summary (figures 2 and 3), (1) there are four structures in the midline beginning with ‘M’; (2) there are four structures on the lateral aspect (or side) starting with ‘S’; (3) there are four cranial nerves each in the medulla, pons and above the pons; (4) the four cranial nerve motor nuclei in the midline are factors of 12 (cranial nerves III, IV, VI, XII; I and II do not have motor nuclei).13
MRI of the patient’s brainstem and detailed infographic of the cross-section of the brainstem showing medial and lateral (or side) structures and their associated neurological deficits. The localisation and size of each area/tract are by approximation and do not correspond to the size in the brainstem. Detailed analysis can be found in the paper by Gates.13 SC, spinocerebellar tracts; SEN V, sensory nucleus of the facial nerve; STh, spinothalamic tracts. Symp, sympathetic tracts.
Sagittal and coronal views of the patient’s MRI with associated infographic of the brainstem showing grossly the position of each cranial nerve. The localisation and size of each cranial nerve/area are by approximation and do not correspond to the size in the brainstem. Detailed analysis can be found in the paper by Gates.13
In our patient, the MRI showed hyperintensities in the periaqueductal white matter and the lesion would have been principally at the central subnucleus, which could explain the presentation of the patient with no other ocular abnormalities.14 This has been sparsely described in the literature9 15 16 and our case illustrates the rare example of a stroke resulting in the presentation of isolated bilateral ptosis.
Conclusion
We, thus, present a rare case of stroke that presented as isolated bilateral ptosis with no ophthalmoplegia or pupillary defect. It is an important differential to rule out given the possibility of complete recovery with thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy at hyperacute stroke units. Thus, the diagnosis of stroke must still be considered and such patients need to be monitored for worsening neurological deficit.
Learning points
-
An isolated bilateral ptosis does not necessarily rule out a stroke, and, thus, this should be considered in the differential diagnosis.
-
Early identification of stroke results in better outcomes and raises the possibility of complete recovery with intervention.
-
Oculomotor nerve weakness has a broad differential diagnosis and often requires meticulous investigation to elucidate the cause.
-
The rule of 4 with regards to the brainstem is very helpful as a simplified method for understanding brainstem anatomy and brainstem vascular syndromes for the non‐neurologist.
Ethics statements
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the patient for allowing us to publish their case as a source of learning.
Footnotes
-
Contributors SJ drafted the paper. KPT edited and finalised the paper.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer